[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] BBWIN cpu
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] BBWIN cpu
- From: "Josh Luthman" <josh (at) imaginenetworksllc.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:47:20 -0400
- References: <10000aa92e665c0eafb431c84e239273 (at) imap> <20080910174210.5c646981 (at) netstation.linuxnetwork.local> <EC70BBBBD43A8B468D2460FE1CFAAA26147F2B4E (at) EX1.nibco.com> <20080910210622.5592ec5a (at) netstation.linuxnetwork.local> <48C83B9E.80706 (at) shadowsoft.com>
I am running a 1982 version of the BB client on one Windows box and it is
reporting load to my $newname4hobbit. Are you comparing load to load or
CPU% to load?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Jon Boede <jon (at) shadowsoft.com> wrote:
> Anybody else using bbwin (0.11) and seeing that it reports CPU much higher
> than what Windows says the CPU load is?
>
> Personally, I'm inclined to believe that Windows is getting it wrong, but
> I'm biased. :-)
>