RE: [hobbit] Migration to SourceForge tracker?

["Jon Dustin" <jdustin (at) usm.maine.edu>]

>>> On 8/22/2008 at 10:01 AM, "T.J. Yang" <tj_yang (at) hotmail.com> wrote:

> If given voting right, I would vote for using trac to coordinate the hobbit 
> community.  sourcefoge looks like has a bigger supersets of features than 
> trac. I like the Statistics (R1) especially. Too bad we (hobbit community) is 
> not totally embraceing sourceforge. Ex, we still have our own mailling list 
> while sourceforge provide this feature.
> 
> I can work with either sourceforge or trac solutions, but please lets 
> utilize a solution's features as much as possible.
> 

Henrik has already spoken about Sourceforge mailing list, and has expressed they are quite unreliable. The existing mailing list works quite well for us now, why not keep it as is?