[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] "Hobbit" name legal stuff; slight name change will happen
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] "Hobbit" name legal stuff; slight name change will happen
- From: "Rob MacGregor" <rob.macgregor (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:47:41 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=JTJ2gquW5McB0GZsUTlcZV0iePIsJWDNFnyGQFCHEus=; b=gWVzbL/dSu7Tl7kSGIR8bBIBSEKfH/V8aeDK43gcB1lSvV885mQAGOBsOyn90TiADS xX8RCDHnMKl7dD2o8MWK465QU/PO4pQTgb7D9bfM64aHgC/03TiCbkewwNc7m8I9/ULw xN7DcYscqWOfaXvho+EUAU0O4frutHqT2eHPU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=O+eni+PvREnVZ1AaUFaNiJvZd75F+GvIvuhtcPwMRWSXVtAMxsEc0fDk5DdR7Y4Lze 7qOwKCsPBo33GjiGoaBrl1Ez+JoxAFSXenWIe1g9E2Kah5RzgjKZm2ZtqDegYXSccerH /0Q5xrgP3PP7FTnPMgQrB6So44rVHbrdOcijI=
- References: <BBA15439DC467648BBAB71E6BA4D990037F7472181 (at) MERCMBX12.na.sas.com> <1F7B01020EC4D04DA17703634B9E888E09BFE297 (at) ULPGCTMVMAI003.EU.COLT> <961092e10808111006g749c1914tc1a417fadaf0f2ef (at) mail.gmail.com> <F19FAA25AF63D242AFBCF1DC9E58A2E3023E685F (at) HQGTNEVS-03.doe.local> <43ea8d070808111141k337397bfy308263ee86bd3be (at) mail.gmail.com> <961092e10808111224p680e2364y1fa27c4531e5bc5c (at) mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 20:24, Josh Luthman <josh (at) imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> By tick I assume you mean a check mark
> http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:eY2rDilNoiIJ::www.aperfectworld.org/clipart/symbols/check.png
> correct?
>
> If so the check is already used by the acknowledgment icon.
I'd forgotten that - doh! A + is probably the simplest other choice
then (or maybe a small OK).
Thinking about it though, as this is about catering for the colour
blind, it's probably worth also considering how to show acknowledged
status codes. Maybe by fading the basic symbol (octagon or triangle)
and overlaying a tick? That would still allow a plain tick as a
"green" code.
--
Please keep list traffic on the list.
Rob MacGregor
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he
doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche