[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Service smtp on xxxxxx is not OK : Unexpected service response
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Service smtp on xxxxxx is not OK : Unexpected service response
- From: "Geoff Hallford" <geoff.hallford (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:52:52 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=+UfF4YZLxSgcgX5EpPWVJsRfOAzT3oJZ/uBM1vALDW4=; b=GVfTrKnIPVIqA0V/uUM9fDUuhZ8hWTsrB3A2l6Ann3NzfQ4q5R/si7iOizJ5lDwukh 3FkADzqCyx3YqmUG1me9PPaq12MoWxeLNBzfEACY3q+JBI/8xSq/s5uR9afyywhYRXl8 9g5X3CbWCvi12x1B3DNQXErNls/qrMp2as+7U=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=JVjwnPegzeHlg0xzZXb6Bsn+gKXO49uLBuKcYVX5gzj/mOAWkR2COmgadhddFNfSnv WMUCrpPg7S/caW0kem0r7Hl1zUQD9Zdnq8ex4hfni8QeCfc8UaA9jTkGazRebMN6JsZR D6g0abZL8T4X7xPTEz6ACREItWExKXsebTXQU=
- References: <911912.8891.qm (at) web50312.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <A0916F0428E0DD4ABDC3881A3AC071C30FDCCB (at) bccsrvdc.BCCIT.nce> <961092e10806250725h1e577799gcb583f370c8bbb50 (at) mail.gmail.com> <A0916F0428E0DD4ABDC3881A3AC071C30FDCD3 (at) bccsrvdc.BCCIT.nce> <43ea8d070806250916g5bd95f18r922c33c9ef0c92f0 (at) mail.gmail.com> <A0916F0428E0DD4ABDC3881A3AC071C30FDCDA (at) bccsrvdc.BCCIT.nce>
I have also seen this happen when the response is slow from the mail server
to show the 220 message. It does show it but is slow for some reason. I
create a new service called smtp-slow by adding the following and then
configure the bb-hosts entry with 'smtp-slow' instead of smtp. Just a
thought.
This way it doesn't require a 220 response but if it gets a valid
"connection" it is okay. If it can't open a connection, it goes red. It does
limit the amount of app validation but it is the only thing that worked in
my case.
[smtp-slow]
send "mail\r\nquit\r\n"
options banner
port 25
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Andrew Clarke <andrew (at) bccit.co.uk> wrote:
> As it happens, there are PIXs between the hobbit server & all the
> Exchange servers. However, they've all been there for ages (years in
> some cases).
>
> I'll have a chat with our resident Cisco guru & see if he made any
> changes at our end around 6th June, when things stopped working.
>
>
> Andrew Clarke
> Support and Technical Development Officer
> BCC IT Solutions
> DDI: 0871 288 2036
> Tel: +44 (0)1239 710823
> http://www.bccit.co.uk/
> Providers of business to business IT Solutions & Services
> Back-up - Anti Virus - Security - Servers - Wireless Networks - VPN -
> Remote Monitoring - Project Consultation Hardware Provision Servers &
> Workstations - Disaster Recovery - Proactive Diagnostics - System Migration
> - Fibre CAT5e Server Administration - Forensics - Grant Appraisal - Network
> Management - System Appraisals - Support Contracts ...
> For full e-mail terms & conditions of use, please follow the link to the
> bcc web site
> http://www.bccitsolutions.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=24&Itemid=1
> BCC IT Solutions is a trading name of European Computer Units Limited,
> Registered in Cardiff, Company Registration No. 2651835
> Registered Office: Unit B Station Road, Newcastle Emlyn, Carmarthenshire,
> Wales, SA38 9BX
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Rob MacGregor [mailto:rob.macgregor (at) gmail.com]
>
> You wouldn't happen to have a Cisco PIX/ASA between the hobbit host and
> the mail server, with it configured to do "fixup"? Those are known for
> breaking things ;)
>
> Rob MacGregor
>
>
> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>
>
>
--
'If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions.'
--Sam Jackson