Re: [hobbit] grouping methods

["Josh Luthman" <josh (at) imaginenetworksllc.com>]

Not sure what the real reasoning is behind this but if you have 1000
servers monitored behind 3 hobbit servers each, figure one Hobbit
server goes down you lost 1000/3000 being monitored.  If you have 3000
servers being monitored behind 1 hobbit server, that one point of
failure leaves you blind of all 3000 servers.

Those are my thoughts, at least =)

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Linder, Doug (SABIC Innovative
Plastics, consultant) <Doug.Linder (at) sabic-ip.com> wrote:
>> Currently I'm running a total if 3 hobbit servers, each in a
>> different data center.
>
> Why 3 servers?
>
> We use one server to monitor hundreds of systems in data centers all
> over the world.  Having one centralized configuration sure makes like a
> lot easier than trying to maintain three of them.
>
> Doug Linder
>
> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>
>
>



-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer