[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [hobbit] Nesting rules in hobbit-alerts.cfg
- To: <hobbit (at) hswn.dk>
- Subject: RE: [hobbit] Nesting rules in hobbit-alerts.cfg
- From: "Sebastian" <spa (at) syntec.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:26:39 -0000
- Disposition-notification-to: "Sebastian" <spa (at) syntec.co.uk>
- Thread-index: AciIV1Rs3xE7R6O2RaKrSA7g0mUvWgA1Wn9Q
Gary,
One way to clean up and simplify your alert rules is to use a (host group)
macro, as in http://www.hswn.dk/hobbiton/2005/01/msg00287.html (but see also
http://www.hswn.dk/hobbiton/2005/01/msg00123.html for a tighter syntax) so
long as these macros can run across lines...
Sebastian
_____
From: Gary Baluha [mailto:gumby3203 (at) gmail.com]
Sent: 17 March 2008 17:47
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Nesting rules in hobbit-alerts.cfg
That was one thought I had, but the current version of Hobbit doesn't
display the group alerting under the "info" column. But I do currently have
some group alerts set up. I'm just looking at ways to clean up and simplify
the alert rules.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Patrick Nixon <pnixon (at) gmail.com> wrote:
Did you look into maybe making a host group out of them?
I forget the hobbit term for them of course, but I know you can do
groups, which is a regex or simple declaration.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Gary Baluha <gumby3203 (at) gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it possible to nest rules in hobbit-alerts.cfg? For example, can I do
> something like this (indenting provided for readability):
>
> PAGE=hostPageA NOTICE RECOVERED
> HOST=hostA,hostB,hostC
> MAIL pager (at) somewhere.com
> HOST=%(hostD[0-9])
> MAIL email (at) somewhere.com
>
> Our alerting rules are starting to get kind of complex, and nesting alert
> rules as above would make things easier. I know I could do something
like:
>
> PAGE=hostPageA NOTICE RECOVERED
> MAIL pager (at) somewhere.com HOST=hostA,hostB,hostC
> MAIL email (at) somewhere.com HOST=%(hostD[0-9])
>
> But some of the HOST= lists are very long (i.e. wrap across multiple
lines),
> so the above 2nd example would look a lot uglier than it does in this post
> (which was simplified for readability). If nesting rules won't work, I
> wonder how much effort would be involved in adding this feature.
>
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk