[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Re: urlplus.pl http/https monitoring extension script
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Re: urlplus.pl http/https monitoring extension script
- From: "Ralph Mitchell" <ralphmitchell (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:20:52 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=u0TTBQ791kPBM/c/ezFpmP6N73VLmnSgUM8z5anUDDY=; b=uGhlxjL1HCf8UUPDBHr0E/SaFDBPKj/yU4cTWF1l9OoJF5bfqAlt/iXQMnGtfre+BDvEK8fUOddshNGbK+CoBKL7vk038JArpws7L1tf60aR2cZh9v88otEpXGmopVT5/pvaY57zyYpRSPSqpahtTlVBeeTzl7n729EUsMhm+JA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T4UjdTfNNcAbXYQ6DN4fDVXbS7wYX9Cfk+oS1elzYPm6IDPkCFXMgoGLrUudq+f401Bwd9mtJVSEp1Zf7WCgqz5SuwG/TGK18HayZ6R3FY+beT4axxaA5xM2d7rUNI7R6+rZkzx5NQN0DTGvcck/+w3k3tKgVEVJnE+HdNIzhs4=
- References: <29f517690801280754x304aee2u5acfd303523037a7 (at) mail.gmail.com> <29f517690802061140l729f7a18k5ea3f7b2af23f8d8 (at) mail.gmail.com> <997a524e0802061317l11a779ydb2a3fb08e44c54a (at) mail.gmail.com> <29f517690802070644x58fd5bf9j4cd12419fdca4d11 (at) mail.gmail.com>
On Feb 7, 2008 8:44 AM, Gary Baluha <gumby3203 (at) gmail.com> wrote:
> Cool, thanks! I only just looked over the diff file, but so far it looks
> pretty good. You did a good job at keeping the same formatting I used too,
> which is nice :-) Only one thing was missed: you didn't add your initials
> and a comment to the revision history section ;-)
Oooops... :)
> Regarding the proxy, I think it would be a good idea to have the proxy url
> in the config file. But I think in general, the config file could use a
> little overhauling, as some of the monitors I set up have long urls and
> especially with the "post" type, long post content as well. It makes the
> single-line format a bit unwieldy to edit. I'll have to come up with
> something when I get a chance.
I can think of at least two other things I'd like to see in the config file:
1) COLUMN - There could be multiple different checks on a given
server. For example: we have a bunch of servers running Tomcat on
ports 8001 & 9001. One port set is always offline (and
disabled-until-OK in Hobbit) The client occasionally asks to switch
clusters, usually at inconvenient (for me) times, so I check both port
sets all the time. A single test hitting both ports would always show
red...
2) per-host authentication - to handle the occasions where a browser
would pop up an authentication box because the server responds with
"401 Unauthorized" & "WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="xxxx" headers.
That would be "curl -u userid:passwd".
I think you're going to end up with multi-line entries per host...
Ralph Mitchell