[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Future of Hobbit - Getting added to distro repos
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Future of Hobbit - Getting added to distro repos
- From: Charles Jones <jonescr (at) cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:18:56 -0700
- Authentication-results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=jonescr (at) cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1478; t=1201724357; x=1202588357; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jonescr (at) cisco.com; z=From:=20Charles=20Jones=20<jonescr (at) cisco.com> |Subject:=20Future=20of=20Hobbit=20-=20Getting=20added=20to =20distro=20repos |Sender:=20; bh=wmbwUOu6W0IhHg3femiIJYUjKX5wr4SSQ1m0Z8cAYz4=; b=Nzzedfq/mM5zfLqQijCB3Ho9Ee5txE6r4kZ5ApFzasA7HfuYerkdL0nHhP Cdd67BxedGKjLLj8ePu3jns8yQXAQKXaLPrVYc3ZJ/0mnqIse+N69eEv5yaf bXDduRj92R;
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)
I am going to attempt to drive getting Hobbit added to the Centos Plus
repository, but first we need to figure out a few things:
1. Who will create and maintain the RPMs
I'd rather someone with experience creating and maintaining
distribution packages do this, but if all else fails I will volunteer.
2. Resolution of common problems when installing Hobbit on RHEL/CentOS
Here are problems I have encountered in the past:
* SELINUX blocks access to hobbit cgi and web content (and probably
the creation of suid hobbitping). So the RPM installer script needs to
set the proper security context on the files.
* librrdtool is not provided in the RHEL or CentOS/CentOS Plus
repository (so even if you had a Hobbit RPM, you would have to go and
get 3 rrdtool packages (rrdtool, rrdtool-devel, and perl-rrdtool) from
the DAG repository. Possible resolution is to also get rrdtool added to
CentOS Plus.
3. Figuring out what would be the most common/preferred/accepted
installation dirs for Hobbit. Last week I installed the FC5 rpm, and it
installed to /etc/hobbit, whereas the tarball by default installs to a
subdirectory of /home. Some people like system tools to be in a "system"
directory, while others like being able to install to a user space
controlled location.
Any other ideas? Am I leaving anything out?
I'd really like to see Hobbit be an available package on "RedHat" (RHEL,
CentOS), as well as Fedora.
-Charles