[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Large number of TIME_WAITs
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Large number of TIME_WAITs
- From: "Gary Baluha" <gumby3203 (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:33:44 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=/wdtmA/nF68j3QWew7HEg5WZD7AeedHMo8oIJeJFlPI=; b=i1Cn6SZoSSfCD56NDDWZbYKFqWzLEX3vbmouvWJmBHcdzWOtxBl1kBOmKJYg3vpnAF4YaoA9nla3mGGGEOm5ns2/6qFEyN2e2ElJmR9C/5gQ5aV9pmss6Y42ioFFtVIAZstprc+AngFzkSVBQu38yGc/LW8HH100fRTdU8ooaCk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Z+u/040LBqqjP1UYBRlgKrPZKx+ah49aRMSv4j08YvzErND2DCZ7ZzrfNW0h8aOAs6Fg1lObi/kopOYAxaAKdC1+UcYUYvaOJtGIWg/KAjq2UT87KfFiYBGepIwuLGjRe/xzZrNnZKEjs29DUNy7Hq+Y5+db17PeZdc0YeEs8+s=
- References: <29f517690801290658l5332aab6i27d68b7bb6d0cc80 (at) mail.gmail.com> <58EF0861D3A1A04182720B3A5231C7C202214135 (at) usplm205.amer.corp.eds.com> <29f517690801290736mf619c3dub2c2c98511945612 (at) mail.gmail.com> <20080129211915.GB26732 (at) hswn.dk>
On Jan 29, 2008 4:19 PM, Henrik Stoerner <henrik (at) hswn.dk> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:36:17AM -0500, Gary Baluha wrote:
> > Red Hat ES 4 Update 5.
> > That's what I normally would think, but it doesn't make any sense that
> the
> > source AND destination are both localhost or the local IP. It's as
> though
> > the Hobbit server is trying to communicate with itself using network
> > sockets.
>
> It makes perfect sense, actually. Various parts of Hobbit does talk to
> the hobbitd daemon - most of the webpages get their data this way, and
> all of the network test results are also reported using a network
> connection.
>
> TIME_WAIT states aren't evil, just confusing if you don't know what they
> are for. They will clear themselves after a few seconds.
Indeed. Thanks for everyone's input.