Re: [hobbit] Future of Hobbit

["Josh Luthman" <josh (at) imaginenetworksllc.com>]

The thing I see packages being beneficial is if there are a lot of users
that need an "easier" installation.  If it costs more support time to make
packages then to drill down the problems with compiling then I could see a
reason to make packages and update them.

Pretty sure it is understood the source isn't disappearing among everyone
here.  I'm sure it will be a cold day in hell when that happens ;)

On 1/24/08, Rich Smrcina <rsmrcina (at) wi.rr.com> wrote:
>
> No one is advocating eliminating the capability of being able to compile
> from source, far from it.
>
> We wish to, hopefully, add to the user base by including Hobbit in major
> distributions like SLES, RHEL and others.
>
> Hubbard, Greg L wrote:
> > A lot of Hobbit users are using Linux-based packages.  Some of us use
> > "commercial" systems, so we have to compile from source.  I think Hobbit
> > would be hobbled if it were to become a Linux-oriented package, which
> > could happen if it were to start depending on a lot of extras that are
> > not easy to port to other operating systems.  People use Hobbit for all
> > sorts of reasons, and in all sorts of environments.
> >
> > GLH
> >
>
> --
> Rich Smrcina
> VM Assist, Inc.
> Phone: 414-491-6001
> Ans Service:  360-715-2467
> rich.smrcina at vmassist.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina
>
> Catch the WAVV!  http://www.wavv.org
> WAVV 2008 - Chattanooga - April 18-22, 2008
>
> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>
>
>


-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer