[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Re: Conn test problems
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Re: Conn test problems
- From: "Hobbit User in Richmond" <hobbit (at) epperson.homelinux.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:02:34 -0500 (EST)
- Importance: Normal
- References: <C839170D12C1FA488B22101CF46F3D3C015FAB49 (at) sgt-xchange1.sgt-dom.com> <3136.141.104.15.147.1200332062.squirrel (at) epperson.homelinux.net> <961092e10801140940i42b97f6t8c05050e7bbd1a16 (at) mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a-1.fc7
Presumably.
On Mon, January 14, 2008 12:40, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Wouldn't the traceroute used by Hobbit be the same command as the shell?
>
> On 1/14/08, Hobbit User in Richmond <hobbit (at) epperson.homelinux.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> Actually, ICMP echo-request and echo-reply packets are almost certainly
>> not an issue here, nor is packet-filtering/firewalling. In current
>> implementations, traceroute by default uses UDP packets to abitrary and
>> unlikely-to-respond ports, varying the TTL and using the ICMP type 11
>> (Time Exceeded) from hops along the way to map the routing path.
>>
>> The manpage in Fedora 8 says "We start our probes with a ttl of one and
>> increase by one until we...got to the "host", or hit a max (which
>> defaults to 30 hops)".
>>
>> So, the behavior you're seeing is as documented. If a firewall were an
>> issue in sending/receiving the packets used by traceroute, you'd see
>> the 30-hop behavior whether the host was up or down.
>>
>> On Mon, January 14, 2008 11:17, Michael A. Price wrote:
>>> Josh,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for helping... The source/destination is on a closed network,
>>> sorry...and I don't own the router...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But, I don't understand, how the traceroute works when the host is
>>> up, but when the host is down it times out???
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If it works when the host is up, then you would think the ACL on the
>>> router just before the host would allow my ICMP packets through.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What is your thoughts???