[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Oversize data/client msg
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Oversize data/client msg
- From: "Gary Baluha" <gumby3203 (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:55:48 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=TNstcacoINOWI1URlOBBxgQ5NG/HwXJ0zw6NipQJviI=; b=Ti0fyJfFwDPLqFFkhSn60YluTgMyhqobmbCzVQTtdiSoC0gxyEalre8FmCnI9hONeXklF7Aaty+qa5y5O16n25Jf9xJZ5B8j3gT+8Kh/UuTD1yKKRqExWQ5eh1hxk4iQl2MWU7+Dve4Zv5kbGQ9W7pC59KEo884f8l0o0QWUAfE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=FPUCZJTFM9+9SZvYQ3J7S+7M8w4EZEnXMmxL8mbLWluITOPluoKxa1iPL9REs/6u/b35rOprfXbY5Et1rIxdQ4mjOTmWZC8bpJiDj3qlbeaxcHM1U1izmg0Wc/utiXh/l2idJYMEypkeWTNoDYGQKMqs2Y8BmC6za7liuI0qNEg=
- References: <002201c85140$330017a0$990046e0$ (at) rr.com> <1199719126.31515.24.camel (at) monkey> <002a01c85142$5d043f70$170cbe50$ (at) rr.com>
On Jan 7, 2008 10:31 AM, Joshua Krause <forums (at) triadbiz.rr.com> wrote:
> In the server man pages it said that the MSGMAX_DATA defaulted to 256kb so
> I
> raised it to 512kb. So your saying that I need to raise it to 768kb? The
> only reason I say this is because in the error message it says:
>
I mentioned to raise it to 768kb only because the other MAX* variables were
set to that. In reality, you only need to raise it to whatever the largest
"data/client msg" size is. In this case, that would be 579186.
> Latest errormessages:
> Oversize data/client msg from 172.31.128.50 truncated (n=579186, limit
> 524288)
> First line: gsonc-spg-omea-1|sunos|sunos
>
> Which says the limit is "524588" and if the MSGMAX_DATA is set to 256 by
> default then I would think that this value is dealing with the
> MSGMAX_CLIENT
> which is defaulted to 512 and I raised it to 768.
MSGMAX_CLIENT is larger than _DATA because the former generally contains
more data. Other than that, there is no need for the three MAX* settings to
have any specific relationship between each other's values.