[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [hobbit] New feature ?

If you can have a standard host name convention, then you could use a
regex.

Tom 

-----Original Message-----
From: s_aiello (at) comcast.net [mailto:s_aiello (at) comcast.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:11 AM
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] New feature ?

On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> But, IMHO, the threshold should be dependant more on the number of 
> CPUs, rather than on the architecture. For example, we have a higher 
> threshold on our X4600s (8 physical, dual core) than our X4100s/X4200s

> (2 physical, some dual-core).
>
> How many CPUs does the Sun T2000 have/report ?
>

I believe the T2000s report 32 processors, in reality there is only 1. 1
x 8 cores x 4 concurrent threads capable.

But for all our devices we normally set our LA thresholds by the
folowing
formula:

Warn:  #CPU x 1
Panic: #CPU x 1.5

My hobbit-clients.cfg would be alot smaller if in the default section,
if I could use a formula definition for LOAD instead of a hardcoded
section.

>Instead of defining runqueue threshhold per host name, it would be nice

>to
have a ARCH option which could be overridden by the HOST

You could hardcode the client's CLASS option to it's arch, and be able
to do what you propose.

 ~Steve

To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk