Re: [hobbit] New feature ?

["s_aiello (at) comcast.net" <s_aiello (at) comcast.net>]

On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> But, IMHO, the threshold should be dependant more on the number of CPUs,
> rather than on the architecture. For example, we have a higher threshold on
> our X4600s (8 physical, dual core) than our X4100s/X4200s (2 physical, some
> dual-core).
>
> How many CPUs does the Sun T2000 have/report ?
>

I believe the T2000s report 32 processors, in reality there is only 1. 1 x 8 
cores x 4 concurrent threads capable.

But for all our devices we normally set our LA thresholds by the folowing 
formula:

Warn:  #CPU x 1
Panic: #CPU x 1.5

My hobbit-clients.cfg would be alot smaller if in the default section, if I 
could use a formula definition for LOAD instead of a hardcoded section.

>Instead of defining runqueue threshhold per host name, it would be nice to 
have a ARCH option which could be overridden by the HOST

You could hardcode the client's CLASS option to it's arch, and be able to do 
what you propose.

 ~Steve