[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] hobbit-alerts.cfg / hobbit and large files
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] hobbit-alerts.cfg / hobbit and large files
- From: "Gary Baluha" <gumby3203 (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 09:28:56 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jMjc5nNac7zSdY6Z6E4Bk5i0FDy8gNl9jAWMh2T1hVU=; b=JnjHwz3CcotuxR8Z9CVrS/9PDlp6m9znWB4JzT6Z/cpP1OO05ZdJikunTM4TYo+mcWuM4KzYk+6gIT+vdc/XN6eAxAbCEiglKJdtrhaMuJWDDAhwOfdpPmtDSHtdUY7xU1QCNqpkbAsoenezxchWJ+hwVDKeAbcGMpEwa1jq+Tc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SniurXfuVrKC6bi13ZznEEkIKM5itTPpwx+GgP7I3e3W7rig6ZDDQcJTIV8fZpvz6F6RRXmPxDl26jEUE79Fij7m2R2iGeHPmuCB4tAKpTxLMIK7uUOQdlA7QVBSJgup4tJQ6VhdgnxRM0Semy8zickZpNnSl2Pom0oOM10YoJI=
- References: <OFD88848DF.23C1A546-ONC125738D.003DC3E1-C125738D.00483829 (at) o2.com>
Hobbit is compiled C code, so it runs much more efficiently than BB
and its shell-script code. From what I understand, Henrik is
monitoring about that many hosts without any difficulties.
On Nov 8, 2007 8:07 AM, <Daniel.Hartwig (at) telefonica.de> wrote:
>
> hello @ll,
>
> I want to change from bb to hobbit. So I would want to know if hobbit can
> handle large files. I know that bb has problems with large files.
> My interest in this case predominantly refers to the hobbit-alerts.cfg file.
> I have 1000-2500 servers and each server has its own warn rule. So the
> hobbit-alert file would become a large file.
> Perhaps someone has also many servers and experience with the size of the
> file. Me interested if hobbit can handle a large file with a good
> performance?
> Because BB always made problems with large files.
>
> Thanks for your information.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
>