[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [hobbit] big brother replacement
- To: <hobbit (at) hswn.dk>
- Subject: RE: [hobbit] big brother replacement
- From: "Tod Hansmann" <thansmann (at) directpointe.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:18:36 -0600
- References: <472A511C.8050604 (at) tmsusa.com> <483387BD5310504F95897573FF3E350D05989DE9 (at) dpex.dpcorp.internal> <472A5B21.8060009 (at) tmsusa.com> <961092e10711011612n4be8ef1bk18feb2cda95de61c (at) mail.gmail.com>
- Thread-index: Acgc3NXGj0nnSHbVQgWDCGBb1u9tlgAAJm8g
- Thread-topic: [hobbit] big brother replacement
I think he's just looking for the alerts. From what he's indicating, it
doesn't look like he's too concerned about the display (unless he has a
bunch of web pages up at once all the time).
Tod Hansmann
Network Engineer
<http://www.directpointe.com/>
________________________________
From: Josh Luthman [mailto:josh (at) imaginenetworksllc.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 5:12 PM
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] big brother replacement
I see what you're saying, but you still have to manually specify which
server you're connecting to. If the bb1.domain.tld can not be reached
the techs have to manually enter bb2.domain.tld - correct?
I know of several BB ext scripts that work perfectly with Hobbit and
even more then just needed a small weak. Would you be able to post the
entire ext script? Hopefully Henrik is willing to answer your $64
question =)
Josh
On 11/1/07, Sloan <joe (at) tmsusa.com> wrote:
Tod Hansmann wrote:
> Let me see if I understand. You have several bb servers at one
> datacenter, each with their twin at the other datacenter, and both
sets
> do the tests. They report to one central display server, but only one
> set reports at a time, depending on failover state, correct?
>
You have the basic idea, but there is no single central server, just
pairs of bb servers, one to a data center, in each lan which is being
monitored. For each pair of bb servers, only the server at data center A
does reporting, unless the server in data center B cannot reach the
server in data center A, in which case the server in data center B will
take over the reporting duties until the bb server in data center A
becomes reachable again. While this could theoretically lead to a split
brain condition, the failover condition has only ever triggered when
there was a wan outage.
> Is this failover automatic? If so, how is this failover determined?
> What if this failover has a false positive? If not, what is your
> timeframe to swap over?
>
IIRC It takes one bb cycle to kick in.
We've not seen a false positive, as I mentioned above.
It's just the standard built-in bb failover -
head ~bb/ext/failover follows:
#!/bin/sh
# failover
#
# BIG BROTHER - FAILOVER SCRIPT
# Sean MacGuire
#
# (c) Copyright Quest Software, Inc. 1997-2003 All rights reserved.
#
#
# failover WATCHES BBNET and BBPAGER
#
# IF BBNET OR BBPAGER BECOMES UNAVAILABLE, THEN TAKE OVER UNTIL THEY
RETURN
#
# To use, just add failover to the BBEXT variable in etc/bbdef.sh
#
# To configure BBPAGER failover:
# define both the primary and failover machines as BBPAGERS in
etc/bb-hosts
# and set bbwarn: FAILOVER in etc/bbwarnsetup.cfg
Joe
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
--
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer