[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [hobbit] The Depends Tag
- To: <hobbit (at) hswn.dk>
 
- Subject: RE: [hobbit] The Depends Tag
 
- From: "Eric Meddaugh" <etmsys (at) rit.edu>
 
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:14:50 -0400
 
- References: <9e070a950710301816o77cc4384yf5ecb8efca58420e (at) mail.gmail.com> <C839170D12C1FA488B22101CF46F3D3C0104020F (at) sgt-xchange1.sgt-dom.com>
 
- Thread-index: AcgbXKg80ouilQYdQZmGitG3wLQSQgAVJ5QAAAW/D0A=
 
- Thread-topic: [hobbit] The Depends Tag
 
 
I use the "route" tag for that instead:
 
192.168.192.20          toronto         # trace conn 
192.168.192.21          oriole           # trace conn route:Toronto
 
You'd get an alert on Toronto......  someone please correct me if my
understanding is wrong.
 
---Eric
 
 
________________________________
From: Michael A. Price [mailto:mprice (at) sgt-inc.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 07:30
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: [hobbit] The Depends Tag
 
Fellow Hobbit users,
 
I need a little help with something, it has stumped me...
 
 
I have two hosts on the same network, if one goes down. The other will
be down also because of a switch issue. I don't want to receive two
alerts. So I wrote in the depends tag, is this correct format???
 
192.168.192.20          toronto         # trace conn 
192.168.192.21          oriole           # trace conn
depends=(conn:toronto/conn)
 
 
If toronto is down and oriole is down, I just one one email alert.
 
Thanks for the help, michael