[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] extended use of procs (the second)
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] extended use of procs (the second)
- From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne (at) staff.telkomsa.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:06:07 +0200
- Cc: Martin Flemming <martin.flemming (at) desy.de>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0710121944450.25200 (at) h1desy07.desy.de>
- User-agent: KMail/1.9.6
On Friday 12 October 2007 19:47:23 Martin Flemming wrote:
> Sorry, my first mail match into another thread (Conn Test Times) ......
>
>
> Hi !
>
> I would use the procs-function to count several software versions &
> programms to see which version will be heavily used or nobody cares about
> it ...
>
> (our software developer want's to know it ) ...
>
> So, the first shot was to include this in the PROCS test and it runs
> really good with rrd-files and graphs ... but the procs-test should be
> only my test for important system-processes ...
>
> So i want to have the same test but with another
> flag like "sfw" or something else ...
Why should it be another test? Just monitor and track these procs, but don't
alert on them, only alert on the system processes.
Regards,
Buchan