[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Re: SNMP (was: Monitoring Web sites with Hobbit)
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Re: SNMP (was: Monitoring Web sites with Hobbit)
- From: henrik (at) hswn.dk (Henrik Stoerner)
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 22:31:56 +0200
- References: <B229D801DD0B3841B2B247772CBF287D0276032C (at) EXCHANGEVS.ad.WrightExpress.com> <20071004054044.GF27318 (at) hswn.dk> <20959.216.104.200.9.1191477611.squirrel (at) qvcs.africaonline.co.ug> <20071004104146.GA32430 (at) hswn.dk> <16BB4B3D76434B4291AC0E4C2E040B76A94CBD (at) exchange1n.nlr.nl>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:02:23AM +0200, Klomp, H. wrote:
> Could you please explain a little about the differences of using the SNMP module in hobbit and using DEVMON ?
>
> I'm busy in switching from Big Brother to hobbit and at the same time want to implement the old MRTG graphs of our cisco
> routers and switches into the hobbit monitoring. Which one should I use, Devmon of your new feature ?
Right now, you should use Devmon. It works, it is - from what I know -
a lot more flexible, and it works with a lot of different types of
network gear.
There are really just two reasons why I started doing some SNMP
tools myself: 1) I was curious to see how it worked, and 2) I am
not sure how Devmon would handle the 12.000 network interfaces that
I must poll every 5 minutes. It might work just fine, I haven't
really looked very much into how Devmon works.
Regards,
Henrik