[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Whoops error
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Whoops error
- From: "Stewart L" <stewartl42 (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:49:57 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7Us7SBNEnmHxkmsvcKDsWAMgPYLvqabjIeJq8aBUteE=; b=oDSfJbeiEHPa57weTnbe7OIWPLIFQg4iDM610wHZH1peh0tkjOxxh58XClccyUjoUaPNc7cTHDoYv8tU+6hvNJ677hSxX29MdCqV3vOUOvCKhjIueEY7pldY0TCvGfCyhuxCrYgvmqKdczM9m23DEnb1zeSWNo0vVFv4FTgYmFI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T4G7UBzdvhcOPCfAJBA7knSGHsdS1/yd0mTSmE4A06l7sEwrgSa1FyPtv//AGhqZS/SYuaAZ8z4Ll3xKx9scIGUdTViiLTExFrcsdHbe0ImWom74c2VIzanxw+P8x490XnM8f6H6FuzQ/wiolcVL8Z+RSqhU/btqtb2SkBqFHnA=
- References: <1d23acab0709111029g1e3ad2d8i38e2ddc6807aa47c (at) mail.gmail.com> <20070911205613.GB13495 (at) hswn.dk>
On 9/11/07, Henrik Stoerner <henrik (at) hswn.dk> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:29:37PM -0400, Stewart L wrote:
> > I get this fairly frequently. Where should I look? this is running on a
> > beefy box, Dell 6850 server with 4 procs and 16GB of RAM.
>
> Have you checked hobbitd.log for any errors ?
The only errors I get in there are a bunch of these...
2007-09-12 22:30:32 Oversize status msg from 192.168.1.62 for
server_name:msgs truncated (n=2206774, limit=262144)
> > bbgen for Hobbit version 4.2.1d
>
> "4.2.1d" is not an official version, so what exactly is it that you're
> running?
It's the official 4.2.0 release with a minor patch. We named it 4.2.1
to keep the rpm packages different and it took us 4 builds (a, b, c,
and d) to get it the way we wanted it.
We monitor over 500 firewalls so we made the host name a link to the
firewall's https admin interface to keep life simple for us (Isn't
open source great!). This has been working fine since release. I
think it has more to do with the load on the box, but I can't be sure.
You can see from the first post that we are monitoring a fair number
of hosts and we have some intensive custom external scripts.
Stewart