[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Acknowledgements & History
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Acknowledgements & History
- From: "Peter Welter" <peter.welter (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:39:15 +0200
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pcdPrIQUMD9kPAA/a7wT6nuVmXkUaWiorUI9K01nCefbql0Mqhvea6JazDGUHfGSXiYpx5wzyAIPW0EVn0yrsWGknxBnoJBMVhCx0q0LmlfEN2ahOUfBQZQWPNJpqN0pd7Q7SWZ6D29A7Tvfod5RSv4CMSzvxF1XhOFh3fD32nM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fvsCxCq7NM1UJmXzDCLu/gC7FzY+sJxr0E9cmFAz4GYsj1GBVaSoVzdElXvn49VW8sMoAeVZXpZknKDQfUhmVS3mpMgsUK1Rs30e1fwSAecSsxkpLJqqRRfmULwPmbfvIaIYNJ0zW9hj8i2Y4PMAeI0UD6qwsK13/otgpfupg6A=
- References: <200707240849.29909.s_aiello (at) comcast.net>
Hi Steve,
Funny, as I searched the mailing list today for the exact same thing
and I totally agree with you on this point. It would be very valuable
information if the acks+info would appear in the history since you
want to treat this differently then planned downtime (a blue dot). You
want this info in the SLA-reports to show up.
Could you comment on this, Henryk? Maybe to show up in 4.3.* (fingers crossed)?
-- Peter
2007/7/24, s_aiello (at) comcast.net <s_aiello (at) comcast.net>:
> All,
>
> I was curious if there was a reason why when an alert is acknowledged, why
> that acknowledgement is not displayed in History. In my mind an
> acknowledgement is a state change, i.e. Red -> to Red-acked. This would also
> help when performing audits on help-desk responsiveness to alerts in Hobbit.
> It would also help, when an alert acknowledgement expires. presently my team
> treats the alert as a new incident. It would be very helpful if they could
> check the history and see that the alert was previously acknowledged and what
> the ack-blurb was.
>
> Or are acks more of a BB legacy thing, and I should really be using
> disabled/maint of tests ?
>
> Thoughts ?
> ~Steve
>
> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>
>
>