[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] hobbitdxboard - Should xboard honor the fields= definition ?
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] hobbitdxboard - Should xboard honor the fields= definition ?
- From: henrik (at) hswn.dk (Henrik Stoerner)
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:23:34 +0200
- References: <200704130948.36242.s_aiello (at) comcast.net>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 09:48:35AM -0400, s_aiello (at) comcast.net wrote:
> I am playing with hobbitdboard & hobbitdxboard. Should the hobbitdxboard honor
> the fields= definition like hobbitdboard does ?
It doesn't.
I don't know if it's OK in XML to leave out certain attributes - I
suppose it is, and in that case there shouldn't be a problem with
implementing the "fields" option to hobbitdxboard.
> In my testing I have found that it does not. Most desireable would be
> to choose to have the full log msg listed.
The <MessageSummary> attribute has the first line of the status message,
which is usually a summary of the data. The amount XML data generated by
hobbitdxboard is already rather large - I'd rather not increase that
much more.
Regards,
Henrik