[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] need advice
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] need advice
- From: Charles Goyard <charles.goyard (at) orange-ftgroup.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:30:11 +0200
- References: <461AE314.5060603 (at) trantor.org>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Galen Johnson wrote :
> Ok, I'm writing a couple of custom monitors for some tasks at the
> office. These can be either client or server scripts and can easily be
> scripted either way. What would you recommend for server versus client
> extensions? What criteria would you use to decide? Some guidelines
> would be helpful for determining which type of script to pursue.
Hi,
I tend to write server-side scripts whenever possible. It prevents
people from slightly changing scripts without notice. It sometimes is
handy to have both server-side and client-side (reporting the exact same
information). For instance, I can monitor most database server remotely,
but some customers don't like the idea of remote access. So the script
runs locally (and gets its config from the hobbit server).
Regards,
--
Charles Goyard - charles.goyard (at) orange-ftgroup.com - (+33) 1 45 38 01 31