[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [hobbit] RE: CPU Utilization Part 2 -- HELP!!!



The Operating System is Solaris.

The graph definitions have not been changed.

 

What should I look for with the client data?
I'm not familiar with rrd.

 

Although if I look at all the clients overall, I see

the same thing, the averaging of CPU Utilization

is a flat-line on everything, even during peak loads.

 

Thanks.James

 

  _____  

From: Hubbard, Greg L [mailto:greg.hubbard (at) eds.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 12:53 PM
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: RE: [hobbit] RE: CPU Utilization Part 2 -- HELP!!!

 

What OS, version, etc.  And did you look into your client data file to see
what is in there?  And has anyone monkeyed with the graph definitions?

 

You have the smoking gun, but that's about all we have to work on...

 


  _____  


From: James Wade [mailto:jkwade (at) futurefrontiers.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 12:49 PM
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: RE: [hobbit] RE: CPU Utilization Part 2 -- HELP!!!

I could not send all the graphs in the same email.

This is the same system with the other two graphs,

but this is a different monitoring tool another group

uses. It shows CPU Utilization at 100% which is

correct with a load of 120+. However, Hobbit, showed

a flatline at 13%..

 

I'm seeing this across the board on all the systems,

and the tool below is being used by the other group

showing the discrepancies. Any suggestions?

 

 

 

Thanks..James


  _____  


From: James Wade [mailto:jkwade (at) futurefrontiers.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 12:42 PM
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: [hobbit] RE: CPU Utilization -- HELP!!!

 

I really need some help on the CPU Utilization graphs.

They just don't look correct.

 

As an example, CPU Load on this box went to 120+,

for an hour, but the CPU Utilization Graph for the same

time period shows only 13% busy. 

 

James