[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Hobbit -vs- BB4

To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Hobbit -vs- BB4
From: "Michael A. Price" <mprice (at) hst.nasa.gov>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:53:08 -0500
References: <4ffdf1bc0703060829g7e23f7f3na84962e3bb5b92@mail.gmail.com> <20070306205119.GA27931@hswn.dk>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)

I currently use hobbit and devmon and love them both...

But the management I work for doesnt like the idea of opensource monitoring everything, they dont understand. So they are pushing me towards BB4 instead... I have never used BB4 and dont want to...

I heard they are both the same...

So I figured I would ask my fellow users, why is hobbit better??? I need to make a god argument for this...

thanks, michael

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [hobbit] Hobbit -vs- BB4
  - From: Hubbard, Greg L
- RE: [hobbit] Hobbit -vs- BB4
  - From: Trent Melcher

References:
- is Hobbit ready for 2007 DST?
  - From: Jerry Yu
- Re: [hobbit] is Hobbit ready for 2007 DST?
  - From: Henrik Stoerner

Prev by Date: Re: [hobbit] is Hobbit ready for 2007 DST?
Next by Date: CPU Graphs
Previous by thread: Re: [hobbit] is Hobbit ready for 2007 DST?
Next by thread: RE: [hobbit] Hobbit -vs- BB4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread