[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [hobbit] CPU LOAD

Perhaps.  I defer to the wisdom of the group.

GLH 

-----Original Message-----
From: Stef Coene [mailto:stef.coene (at) docum.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:57 PM
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] CPU LOAD

On Wednesday 08 November 2006 22:34, Hubbard, Greg L wrote:
> James,
>
> Not that I know of.  I thought that the Unix "load" number simply 
> reflects the run queue length for the system as a whole, which is 
> pretty much the same no matter how many CPU's there are.  Or are you 
> willing to tolerate larger numbers for systems with fewer CPUs?
20 processes in the run queue is bad on a system with 1 cpu 20 processes
in the run queue is no problem for a system with 64 cpu's


Stef

To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk