[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Problem with 'worst' conn method reporting
- To: <hobbit (at) hswn.dk>
- Subject: RE: Problem with 'worst' conn method reporting
- From: "Schwimmer, Eric E *HS" <EES2Y (at) hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 09:58:51 -0400
- Thread-index: AcXhTZ8b61z0eP3dR7GYh6id3yd3KycWh3Eg
- Thread-topic: Problem with 'worst' conn method reporting
Doesn't look like this made its way into the current alfa code.
(We must migrated to a new servers and this bit me again, so
I thought I'd give it a bump).
-Eric Schwimmer
Network Engineer
UVA HSCS Network Engineering
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schwimmer, Eric E *HS
> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 9:40 AM
> To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
> Subject: Problem with 'worst' conn method reporting
>
>
> Hi Henrik,
>
> We've had a problem with the 'worst' conn method for a while now,
> and I've never got around to reporting or looking into it. Basically
> what happens is that a host with multiple IP addresses and the 'worst'
> conn method wont report any status changes (it will always be
> green, even
> if one or all of its ips are unpingable).
>
> I think I've fixed this, it was a pretty simple bug; on line
> 1383 of bbtest-net.c, I changed 'countasdown = 0;' to
> 'countasdown = 1;'.
> I didn't really investigate the ramifications of what this
> change might
> have on the rest of the code, so let me know if I'm way off base.
> (I know it did fix the worst issue, though, because 3 of our
> multi-interface
> sites with unpingable ifcs immediately went red).
>
> Regards,
> -Eric Schwimmer
> Network Engineer
> UVA HSCS Network Engineering
>