Re: [hobbit] Re: code specific rrdidx question

["Jeff Newman" <jeffnewman75 (at) gmail.com>]

ya it would appear so far that apart from disk, I have only been able to
get a maximum of 4 graphs on the detail page (obviously disk can do
more on the detail page)

As far as the root cause of my problem, changing the .rrd files from
sar0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
to
sar00,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12,13,14,15

fixed the problem.

-Jeff

On 3/23/06, Hubbard, Greg L <greg.hubbard (at) eds.com> wrote:
> You might compare your graph definition with the ones used for disks.
> The disk detail page can show more than one image.  This might be a
> restriction on CUSTOM graphs instead of the ones that are built in.
> Henrik mentioned a while back that we could only have one graph on the
> detail page, and that it would be a big chore to change the code to
> allow more than one custom graph on the detail page.
>
> Evidently the trend page uses a different path.
>
> GLH
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Newman [mailto:jeffnewman75 (at) gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:10 PM
> To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
> Subject: [hobbit] Re: code specific rrdidx question
>
> UPDATE:
>
> I somewhat fixed the problem.
>
> This is for sure:
>
> A directory that has:
> sar,cpu0 , sar,cpu1 , sar,cpu2 , sar,cpu3 ...... sar,cpu10, ...
> sar,cpu15
>
> will break on both the status and trends page after it does sar,cpu1
>
> I changed all the RRD's/tests to do:
>
> sar,cpu00 , sar,cpu01 , sar,cpu02 , sar,cpu03 ..... sar,cpu15
>
> and it now does not break.
>
> I still only see 0,1,2,3 on the button's page. The trends page shows all
> 16 cpu's. Any idea why the button page only shows the first 4?
> Again, I have sar::1 in the hobbitserver.cfg, so it generates 1 graph
> for each CPU
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
>
> On 3/22/06, Jeff Newman <jeffnewman75 (at) gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sorry for the traffic, wanted to change this to say that maybe it
> > isn't just (or plain isn't) RRDIDX, but maybe FNPATTERN as well. So
> > add to my questions:
> >
> > Does FNPATTERN have a problem distinguishing between
> > cpu1 and cpu10
> >
> > -Jeff
> >
> >
> > On 3/22/06, Jeff Newman <jeffnewman75 (at) gmail.com> wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I don't know C all that well, so I need some assistance.
> > >
> > > what are the limits/constraints of RRDIDX for graphing?
> > >
> > > I believe the answer is buried somewhere in hobbitgraph.c
> > >
> > > Here is my test case:
> > >
> > > I had:
> > >
> > > sar,cpu0.rrd
> > > sar,cpu1.rrd
> > > sar,cpu2.rrd
> > > sar,cpu3.rrd
> > > ...
> > > sar,cpu10.rrd
> > > sar,cpu11.rrd
> > > ...
> > > sar,cpu15.rrd
> > >
> > > hobbitgraph.cfg:
> > >
> > > [sar]
> > >        FNPATTERN sar,(.*).rrd
> > >        TITLE CPU sar
> > >        YAXIS %
> > >        DEF:usr (at) RRDIDX@= (at) RRDFN@:cpu (at) RRDIDX@pcntusr:AVERAGE
> > >        DEF:sys (at) RRDIDX@= (at) RRDFN@:cpu (at) RRDIDX@pcntsys:AVERAGE
> > >        DEF:wio (at) RRDIDX@= (at) RRDFN@:cpu (at) RRDIDX@pcntwio:AVERAGE
> > >        DEF:idl (at) RRDIDX@= (at) RRDFN@:cpu (at) RRDIDX@pcntidl:AVERAGE
> > >        AREA:usr (at) RRDIDX@#0000FF:@RRDPARAM (at) pcntusr
> > >        GPRINT:usr (at) RRDIDX@:LAST: \: %5.1lf (cur)
> > >        GPRINT:usr (at) RRDIDX@:MAX: \: %5.1lf (max)
> > >        GPRINT:usr (at) RRDIDX@:MIN: \: %5.1lf (min)
> > >        GPRINT:usr (at) RRDIDX@:AVERAGE: \: %5.1lf (avg)\n
> > >        STACK:sys (at) RRDIDX@#FF0000:@RRDPARAM (at) pcntsys
> > >        GPRINT:sys (at) RRDIDX@:LAST: \: %5.1lf (cur)
> > >        GPRINT:sys (at) RRDIDX@:MAX: \: %5.1lf (max)
> > >        GPRINT:sys (at) RRDIDX@:MIN: \: %5.1lf (min)
> > >        GPRINT:sys (at) RRDIDX@:AVERAGE: \: %5.1lf (avg)\n
> > >        STACK:wio (at) RRDIDX@#800080:@RRDPARAM (at) pcntwio
> > >        GPRINT:wio (at) RRDIDX@:LAST: \: %5.1lf (cur)
> > >        GPRINT:wio (at) RRDIDX@:MAX: \: %5.1lf (max)
> > >        GPRINT:wio (at) RRDIDX@:MIN: \: %5.1lf (min)
> > >        GPRINT:wio (at) RRDIDX@:AVERAGE: \: %5.1lf (avg)\n
> > >        STACK:idl (at) RRDIDX@#008000:@RRDPARAM (at) pcntidl
> > >        GPRINT:idl (at) RRDIDX@:LAST: \: %5.1lf (cur)
> > >        GPRINT:idl (at) RRDIDX@:MAX: \: %5.1lf (max)
> > >        GPRINT:idl (at) RRDIDX@:MIN: \: %5.1lf (min)
> > >        GPRINT:idl (at) RRDIDX@:AVERAGE: \: %5.1lf (avg)\n
> > >
> > >
> > > hobbitserver.cfg has sar::1 (to only draw 1 graph per cpu) for
> > > GRAPHS, and just regular "sar" is in TEST2RRD
> > >
> > > sar is in the "multitest" section of hobbitcgi.cfg, as well as
> > > listed in the extra tests section of hobbitlaunch.cfg
> > >
> > > On a host with 4 CPU's (0,1,2,3) it draws 4 graphs On a host with 16
>
> > > CPU's (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15)
> > > It would draw a graph for 0,1, and broken boxes for 2,3, and no
> others.
> > >
> > > SO, I removed "10,11,12,13,14,15" and outputted them to a,b,c,d,e,f
> > > respectively.
> > >
> > > The graphs then drew 0,1,2,3 and no more.
> > >
> > > If I click on a specific graph, and change the "first=" to 5, it
> > > will draw a graph for CPU4, so somewhere, the first= line isn't
> > > getting generated correctly.
> > >
> > > So I guess 2 questions:
> > >
> > > 1 already stated (limitations of RRDIDX - does is get confused by 1
> > > vs 10 for example) The other is where the first= line gets updated
> > > and why isn't it getting updated correctly?
> > >
> > > Any insights would be much apprieciated, as this is driving me nuts.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jeff
> > >
> >
>
> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>
>
>