[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [hobbit] Default order of Current non-green Systems
- To: <hobbit (at) hswn.dk>
- Subject: RE: [hobbit] Default order of Current non-green Systems
- From: "Andrew Clarke" <andrew (at) bccit.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:17:29 -0000
- Thread-index: AcYV+PWM65aeDBj2StyGSXNsSCGtuwAAJeAgAGApyOA=
- Thread-topic: [hobbit] Default order of Current non-green Systems
So, is there any reason for the partially sorted order of my items?
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Clarke [mailto:andrew (at) bccit.co.uk]
> Hmm - strange. On my system :-
> AKA r********-fs
> ARAD**** arad*
> DG*** Dg***
> FB* ten*******
> THA***-N*****
> THA***-P******
> bcc***02
> bcc***04
> CB*** t****
> C&C cn******
> CAN*** co*****1
> DG*** Dg*****
> DG*** Dg********1
> RE**** ho-********1
> So, sort of A-Z a-z but in two blocks.
> NB: This is a list of remote & local BB clients as well as CONN tests
> NB2: I use the NAMES statement in the hosts file to help identify the
> clients.
-----Original Message-----
> > From: Henrik Stoerner [mailto:henrik (at) hswn.dk]=20
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:01:23PM -0000, Andrew Clarke wrote:
> > > Is there any logic in the order of items on the "Current non-green
> > > Systems" screen?
> > > Is it possible to have it sorted alphabetically?
> > Huh ? It *is* sorted alphabetically - strictly, so A B C ... a b c
...
> > Henrik