[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Anyone working on an NT client? (off topic)
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Anyone working on an NT client? (off topic)
- From: Anton Burkhalter <anton.burkhalter (at) gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:11:27 +0100
- References: <C99DCCB44C93494CB2779B5233674393019AA69B@MAIL03.orhs.org>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
Hi all,
There is nothing special with such stuff in the date string :-)
Examples:
Standard on my system:
# date
Wed Dec 28 21:00:46 CET 2005
# echo $TZ
CET-1CEST-2,M3.5.0/2,M10.5.0/3
Playing with the TZ environment:
# TZ=FOO-1BAR
# date
Wed Dec 28 21:01:34 FOO 2005
# TZ=UEST-1WONDERING
# date
Wed Dec 28 21:01:47 UEST 2005
Toni
My management (even the director was curious about this) asked for the
same thing, do we have access to the source for the Windows client. So
you are not alone there. We told them no, were allowed anyway to
install the Windows client, over the objections of some of our security
and intel team.
:) Fortunately, the intel manager is an old UNIX guy :)
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: PAUL WILLIAMSON [mailto:pwilliamson (at) mandtbank.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 10:53 AM
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Anyone working on an NT client?
KauffmanT (at) nibco.com 12/28/05 10:30 AM >>>
I'm interested.
I currently run the BB/Quest bbnt client, but my NT admins would
feel a whole lot better about installing it if we had the source.
Why? Do you have the source to Windows NT? How about
to Exchange or SAP? I know, maybe Larry will give you
the source to Oracle...
I don't get why having the source is of any consequence...
Paul