[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] maint.pl with no email
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] maint.pl with no email
- From: Asif Iqbal <iqbala-hobbit (at) qwestip.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:12:55 -0500
- Mail-followup-to: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- References: <3D8746D3B6F2E049A3D3103E7A55B9E8027707F2@Toroondc913>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:00:56PM, brent.mccrackin (at) bell.ca wrote:
> And if the groups that need to be notified that a service is disabled
> for maintenance are different from the people that need to be notified
> of an outage?
I would try the 'NOTIFY'. It is in RC4.
>
> For example, when maintenance is started we don't want the on-call pager
> being alerted that a service has been disabled for maintenance - the
> purpose of a blue dot is so the person carrying the pager isn't woken up
> unnecessarily. We do want the admins group to be notified that the
> maintenance has started, though.
>
> ---
> Brent B McCrackin
> UNIX Systems Specialist - Bell Sympatico
> Brent.McCrackin (at) Bell.ca PH: 416-353-0692
> "Serenity through viciousness."
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Stoerner [mailto:henrik (at) hswn.dk]
> Sent: February 26, 2005 12:12 PM
> To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
> Subject: Re: [hobbit] maint.pl with no email
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:32:35PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:22:34PM, Henrik Stoerner wrote:
> > >
> > > Frankly, this part of maint.pl is just plain broken.
> >
> > Well I had to add/modify couple things to make it work as it was
> > with Bigbrother.
>
> [snip the hack]
>
> > I am positive Henrik has a cooler solution for this.
>
> Perhaps ... I've been cooking up something today that might be useful.
>
> Instead of the "page notify-admin" recipient, I implemented a new
> command in the Hobbit protocol called "notify". When you send a
> "notify" command to the hobbit server, you also pass it a hostname,
> a testname, and a text message. Hobbit then sends this message through
> the alert module just as a normal alert-message about a status that
> has gone red - and the message is sent out using the normal methods
> configured for the recipients for that particular host+test
> combination.
>
> So what happens is that when you disable a test, everyone that would
> normally receive an alert about that test will get a message that it
> has been disabled.
>
> And the same when it is re-enabled, of course.
>
> I think that makes more sense than sending to the generic
> "notify-admin" recipient.
>
>
> Henrik
>
> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>
>
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, not the most intelligent, but
the one most responsive to change." - Charles Darwin