[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [hobbit] Scalability?

To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Scalability?
From: Chris Ricker <chris.ricker (at) knology.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:29:01 -0500
Organization: Organization? What's that?
References: <D0CF470B361DB646881635F38AE189B8021D1A24@min.macrovision.com> <20050113212159.GB10407@hswn.dk> <20050114103030.GA484@hswn.dk>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127)

Henrik Stoerner wrote:

I'm monitoring about 2000 machines currently, with my production box
running Big Brother + bbgen, and the test server running Hobbit.
The load on the Hobbit box is about 1/4 of the load on the BB box.

Correction - since I just found a bug that caused Hobbit to use much
more CPU time than it should:

The load on the Hobbit box is about 1/10 of the load on the BB box.

What are you doing to get clients to send to both the production box and to Hobbit? iptables mirror or similar?

thanks,
chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [hobbit] Scalability?
  - From: Henrik Stoerner

References:
- Scalability?
  - From: Kimberly McKinnis
- Re: [hobbit] Scalability?
  - From: Henrik Stoerner
- Re: [hobbit] Scalability?
  - From: Henrik Stoerner

Prev by Date: Resolved (Re: [hobbit] http check not working?)
Next by Date: Re: [hobbit] Scalability?
Previous by thread: Re: [hobbit] Scalability?
Next by thread: Re: [hobbit] Scalability?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread