[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [hobbit] Scalability?
- To: <hobbit (at) hswn.dk>
- Subject: RE: [hobbit] Scalability?
- From: "Wim De Houwer" <wdehouwer (at) be.tiscali.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:00:10 +0100
- Disposition-notification-to: "Wim De Houwer" <wdehouwer@be.tiscali.com>
- Thread-index: AcT6JCxvsPwfegjHTWuUrRfeusOLdgAA+u3w
- Thread-topic: [hobbit] Scalability?
Can you paste a diff or will there be a new release ?
Thanks,
Wim
-----Original Message-----
From: Henrik Stoerner [mailto:henrik (at) hswn.dk]
Sent: vrijdag 14 januari 2005 11:31
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Scalability?
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 10:21:59PM +0100, Henrik Stoerner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:42:06PM -0800, Kimberly McKinnis wrote:
> >
> > We're monitoring over 1000 machines currently and this number will
be
> > greatly increasing in the near future. I was looking for something
more
> > scalable that doesn't include Nagios (hate it), and is something
> > familiar and similar to BB. Thanks.
>
> I'm monitoring about 2000 machines currently, with my production box
> running Big Brother + bbgen, and the test server running Hobbit.
> The load on the Hobbit box is about 1/4 of the load on the BB box.
Correction - since I just found a bug that caused Hobbit to use much
more CPU time than it should:
The load on the Hobbit box is about 1/10 of the load on the BB box.
Henrik
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk