[Xymon] Anyone got a patch for the 24-hour limit on ACKS? Or a script to invoke acknowledge.sh?

[J.C. Cleaver]

Betsy,

Have you noticed any difference in success depending on how you're
specifying the duration? (eg, "1d" vs "24h", etc.?)

There's one "magic value" relating to a full day when we're generating the
ack code to begin with, but on walking through the module code I can't see
how it would cause an effect like this.


After the acknowledgement, the expiration time of the current one should
be displayed on the status page for that test. Can you confirm that the
pending date in those cases is what you'd expect it to be?

Sort of grasping at straws here. I'll keep digging in, but so far things
seem to be working correctly for me.

Regards,
-jc


On Mon, October 19, 2015 10:38 am, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
> My suspicion would be that the test briefly exits the bad state, or you
> have a problem with a clock somewhere. One weird issue that I used to have
> is if I set acknowledgments too long (we are talking like 999 weeks), IRIX
> would expire them almost immediately. But that would not happen under your
> circumstance certainly.
>
> --
> ____ *Note: UMDNJ is now Rutgers-Biomedical and Health Sciences*
> || \\UTGERS      |---------------------*O*---------------------
> ||_// Biomedical | Ryan Novosielski - Senior Technologist
> || \\ and Health | novosirj at rutgers.edu<mailto:novosirj at rutgers.edu>-
> 973/972.0922 (2x0922)
> ||  \\  Sciences | OIRT/High Perf & Res Comp - MSB C630, Newark
>     `'
>
> On Oct 19, 2015, at 13:07, Betsy Schwartz
> <betsy.schwartz at gmail.com<mailto:betsy.schwartz at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> our acks always always always seem to time out
> what are we doing differently?
>
> we're running xymon 4.3.21 on RHEL6
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Ralph Mitchell
> <ralphmitchell at gmail.com<mailto:ralphmitchell at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I have ack-by-email set up, and can send multi-day/week acks without a
> problem.
>
> Ralph Mitchell
>
> On Oct 19, 2015 11:02 AM, "Root, Paul T"
> <Paul.Root at centurylink.com<mailto:Paul.Root at centurylink.com>> wrote:
> I was just doing an ack for 1+ days.
>
> It will only get cancelled if the test in question goes green however
> briefly.
>
> A disable will persist if it is set to expire at a certain time.
>
> From: Xymon
> [mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com<mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com>] On Behalf
> Of Novosielski, Ryan
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 9:59 AM
> To: betsy.schwartz at gmail.com<mailto:betsy.schwartz at gmail.com>
> Cc: xymon at xymon.com<mailto:xymon at xymon.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xymon] Anyone got a patch for the 24-hour limit on ACKS? Or
> a script to invoke acknowledge.sh?
>
> I have never found acks to have a 24 hour limit. Can anyone confirm
> whether this is definitely true or not?
>
> ____ *Note: UMDNJ is now Rutgers-Biomedical and Health Sciences*
> || \\UTGERS      |---------------------*O*---------------------
> ||_// Biomedical | Ryan Novosielski - Senior Technologist
> || \\ and Health | novosirj at rutgers.edu<mailto:novosirj at rutgers.edu>-
> 973/972.0922<tel:973%2F972.0922> (2x0922)
> ||  \\  Sciences | OIRT/High Perf & Res Comp - MSB C630, Newark
>     `'
>
> On Oct 19, 2015, at 10:57, Betsy Schwartz
> <betsy.schwartz at gmail.com<mailto:betsy.schwartz at gmail.com>> wrote:
> We've GOT to be able to ack alerts and have the ack survive the weekend.
> (if I can call acknowledge.sh from perl I have a script that can scrape
> the board and re-ack)
> thank you!!
>