[Xymon] SMTP test needs much more capability
White, Bruce
bewhite at fellowes.com
Fri May 20 19:12:11 CEST 2011
Never mind
Bruce White
Senior Enterprise Systems Engineer | Phone: 1-630-671-5169 | Fax: 630-893-1648 | bewhite at fellowes.com | http://www.fellowes.com/
Disclaimer: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Fellowes, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: xymon-bounces at xymon.com [mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com] On Behalf Of White, Bruce
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 12:11 PM
To: Shawn Heisey; xymon at xymon.com
Subject: Re: [Xymon] SMTP test needs much more capability
Add an "expect" clause in your bb-services entry after the "send helo"
clause. I have an "expect "220" as that is the response I get from a
helo being sent to our Exchange server.b The response you get will
probably be different.
.....Bruce
Bruce White
Senior Enterprise Systems Engineer | Phone: 1-630-671-5169 | Fax: 630-893-1648 | bewhite at fellowes.com | http://www.fellowes.com/
Disclaimer: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Fellowes, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: xymon-bounces at xymon.com [mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com] On Behalf
Of Shawn Heisey
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 11:32 AM
To: xymon at xymon.com
Subject: [Xymon] SMTP test needs much more capability
I have been chasing down the following. The first is the smtp status
reported on the xymon status page (which is green), debian package
version 4.3.0-0.beta2. The second is a corresponding message from
mail.log on the Postfix (2.7.1 debian package) server.
220 nexus2.example.com ESMTP Postfix (Debian/GNU)
503 5.5.1 Error: send HELO/EHLO first
221 2.0.0 Bye
May 20 10:08:15 nexus2 postfix/smtpd[8689]: improper command pipelining
after MAIL from mcp.example.com[10.2.1.39]
After a lengthy exchange with Wietse Venema on the postfix-users mailing
list, I got to the bottom of it, and there's no problem with postfix.
The 503 error is because Xymon does not send a HELO. I've determined
that if I send the following, I can avoid the 503 error:
helo xymon
mail from: xymon at example.com
quit
If I modify the smtp test to send these strings, the "improper
pipelining" message is still logged. This is because Xymon is breaking
SMTP rules by not waiting for the response to each command before
sending the next one. There are no longer any errors logged during the
actual SMTP session, because I have added the xymon server to a list
that allows it to get away with improper pipelining, and to another one
that lets it send invalid HELO strings and FROM addresses.
This would be a problem if I had to monitor a remote postfix server
whose configuration I could not control, though. The only reason that
the test passes is that the string it looks for (220) is returned in the
initial banner, before any SMTP commands are sent. It is not actually a
real test. Any number of postfix configuration errors would keep the
server from working, yet still return the banner on initial connect.
Does anyone know how to make Xymon smart enough to wait for a defined
response on each command before sending the next, and to put custom
commands into a config file, rather than built in at compile time via
protocols.cfg? Ideally it would be able to understand that any 4nn or
5nn code is a problem as well. I will take a look at the code, but my
programming skills are rusty.
Thanks,
Shawn
_______________________________________________
Xymon mailing list
Xymon at xymon.com
http://lists.xymon.com/mailman/listinfo/xymon
_______________________________________________
Xymon mailing list
Xymon at xymon.com
http://lists.xymon.com/mailman/listinfo/xymon
More information about the Xymon
mailing list