[hobbit] ping test is too slow

thorsten.erdmann at daimler.com thorsten.erdmann at daimler.com
Mon Jun 28 11:03:30 CEST 2010


Hello,

thanks for your answers and suggestions. But I fear I have some problems 
understanding what you mean.
But first I think you need some more information. Most of our monitored 
systems where monitored via IP-address, not via hostnames by using the 
"testip" tag. Only 196 systems are tested using DNS-names.

> questy at gmail.com schrieb am 24.06.2010 16:08:04:
> Also, run a long-running ping test against an IP list and in another
> window against a domain name list. 
How can I ping a domain? That does not work, I never heared that I can 
ping a DNS domain name:

  # ping de068.corpintra.net
  ping: unknown host de068.corpintra.net

I can ping any host in that domain:

  # ping s068t001.de068.corpintra.net
  PING s068t001.de068.corpintra.net (53.42.8.236) 56(84) bytes of data.
  64 bytes from s068t001.de068.corpintra.net (53.42.8.236): icmp_seq=0 
ttl=127 time=0.266 ms
  64 bytes from s068t001.de068.corpintra.net (53.42.8.236): icmp_seq=1 
ttl=127 time=0.244 ms
  64 bytes from s068t001.de068.corpintra.net (53.42.8.236): icmp_seq=2 
ttl=127 time=0.268 ms
  64 bytes from s068t001.de068.corpintra.net (53.42.8.236): icmp_seq=3 
ttl=127 time=0.281 ms
  64 bytes from s068t001.de068.corpintra.net (53.42.8.236): icmp_seq=4 
ttl=127 time=0.261 ms
  64 bytes from s068t001.de068.corpintra.net (53.42.8.236): icmp_seq=5 
ttl=127 time=0.287 ms
  64 bytes from s068t001.de068.corpintra.net (53.42.8.236): icmp_seq=6 
ttl=127 time=0.233 ms
  64 bytes from s068t001.de068.corpintra.net (53.42.8.236): icmp_seq=7 
ttl=127 time=0.261 ms

It seems to make no difference if I ping the name with or without domain 
or the IP address.

>  If your DNS is not resolving properly, it can increase your ping
> times as well, because ping does a DNS lookup as well when it
> executes.
Ok, but then the turnaround time calculation of Hobbit would be wrong. The 
20 seconds DNS resolve time is included in the ping test time, so it is 
double calculated!?

>  Check your DNS server/records, walk through your bb-hosts file to
> determine if something is timing out/not resolving, and I suspect
> you'll find the culprit
How can I check DNS server/records if I have no administrative access to 
the DNS server. The DNS server entries on my Hobbit server seems to be 
correct:

  # cat /etc/resolv.conf
  domainname de068.corpintra.net
  search de068.corpintra.net
  nameserver 53.42.4.22    # primary DNS server
  nameserver 53.42.6.22    # secondary DNS server

But I think you are right with some DNS problems, because we have some 
timing issues sometimes with accessing server shares and something. But I 
don't know how to find out this. So if there is somebody out there who is 
willing to help me resolving this, you man conatact me personally on 
thorsten dot erdmann at daimler dot com, because this would be not a real 
Hobbit related problem and so does not fit exactliy on this list.

> > resolution time never crawls above the microseconds all that much. 
 Your OP
> > states that sometimes it takes up to 20 seconds to get resolution, and 
I'm
I think this meant that all DNS queries together in one run of the network 
test is 20 seconds. At 196 hosts using DNS this would be 0.1 seconds per 
host.

> > As much as I hate to suggest such a thing because of other potential 
bugs,
> > could you gain any benefit from having nscd running on the Xymon host 
only?
What do you mean with Xymon host _only_.
On my Hobbit host there seems to be no nscd running at all:
  # ps -ef |grep nscd
  root      1279 25262  0 11:00 pts/1    00:00:00 grep nscd
Should it run, if the Hobbit host is not a DNS server?

Thorsten Erdmann







> > ---
> > Jerald M. Sheets jr.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:09 AM, <thorsten.erdmann at daimler.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello again
> >>
> >> Is there really no other option to speed up the ping test, maybe by 
using
> >> multiple instance of fping/hobbitping. A collegue has the same issue 
on a
> >> Hobbitserver running on HPUX.
> >> I am running Redhat EL.
> >>
> >> Thorsten Erdmann
> >>
> >>
> >> thorsten.erdmann at daimler.com schrieb am 18.06.2010 14:06:43:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > > On Monday, 14 June 2010 19:12:33 White, Bruce wrote:
> >> > > > My experience with "hobbitping", is that it is just slower. 
 You are
> >> > > > better off downloading and installing "fping".   Once you do 
this,
> >> > > > you
> >> > > > will need to rebuild hobbit and select fping in the build 
process.
> >> > >
> >> > > Instead of rebuilding hobbit, you can change FPING in 
hobbitserver.cfg
> >> > > to
> >> > > "/path/to/fping -Ae " or similar.
> >> >
> >> > sorry for the delay. I just tried fping. But the turnaround time is
> >> > exactly the same, no benefit. Any other ideas?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > bbtest-net version 4.2.0
> >> > SSL library : OpenSSL 0.9.7a Feb 19 2003
> >> > LDAP library: OpenLDAP 20213
> >> >
> >> > Statistics:
> >> >  Hosts total           :      834
> >> >  Hosts with no tests   :       20
> >> >  Total test count      :      819
> >> >  Status messages       :      820
> >> >  Alert status msgs     :        0
> >> >  Transmissions         :       10
> >> >
> >> > DNS statistics:
> >> >  # hostnames resolved  :      287
> >> >  # succesful           :      287
> >> >  # failed              :        0
> >> >  # calls to dnsresolve :      289
> >> >
> >> > TCP test statistics:
> >> >  # TCP tests total     :        3
> >> >  # HTTP tests          :        2
> >> >  # Simple TCP tests    :        1
> >> >  # Connection attempts :        3
> >> >  # bytes written       :      261
> >> >  # bytes read          :     1467
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > TIME SPENT
> >> > Event                                            Starttime
> >> >  Duration
> >> > bbtest-net startup                       1276862496.735994
> >> >   -
> >> > Service definitions loaded               1276862496.738353
> >> >  0.002359
> >> > Tests loaded                             1276862496.780920
> >> >  0.042567
> >> > DNS lookups completed                    1276862511.817886
> >> > 15.036966
> >> > Test engine setup completed              1276862511.823173
> >> >  0.005287
> >> > TCP tests completed                      1276862511.825895
> >> >  0.002722
> >> > PING test completed (814 hosts)          1276862553.583528
> >> > 41.757633
> >> > PING test results sent                   1276862553.718441
> >> >  0.134913
> >> > Test result collection completed         1276862553.718452
> >> >  0.000011
> >> > LDAP test engine setup completed         1276862553.718454
> >> >  0.000002
> >> > LDAP tests executed                      1276862553.718455
> >> >  0.000001
> >> > LDAP tests result collection completed   1276862553.718456
> >> >  0.000001
> >> > NSLOOKUP tests executed                  1276862554.634700
> >> >  0.916244
> >> > Test results transmitted                 1276862554.700414
> >> >  0.065714
> >> > bbtest-net completed                     1276862554.702291
> >> >  0.001877
> >> > TIME TOTAL
> >> > 57.966297
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thorsten Erdmann
> >> >
> >> > bgmilne at staff.telkomsa.net schrieb am 15.06.2010 12:32:39:
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Buchan
> >> > >
> >> > > To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> >> > > hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately
> >> > that you have received this e-mail in error, and delete it. We 
thank
> >> > you for your cooperation.
> >> If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately 
that
> >> you have received this e-mail in error, and delete it. We thank 
> you for your
> >> cooperation.
> >
> >
> 
> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
> 


If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately that you have received this e-mail in error, and delete it. We thank you for your cooperation.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.xymon.com/pipermail/xymon/attachments/20100628/d6aa59f7/attachment.html>


More information about the Xymon mailing list