[hobbit] Migration to SourceForge tracker?

[Stewart L]

correct... I was confusing tracker for Trac.

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:02 AM, T.J. Yang <tj_yang at hotmail.com> wrote:

>  nope, there is no free trac hosting site to my knowledge.
>
> T.J. Yang
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:11:31 -0500
> From: ralphmitchell at gmail.com
>
> To: hobbit at hswn.dk
> Subject: Re: [hobbit] Migration to SourceForge tracker?
>
> One advantage of using Sourceforge is that they are hosting it.  Is there a
> similar site hosting Trac??
>
> Ralph Mitchell
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:01 AM, T.J. Yang <tj_yang at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>  If given voting right, I would vote for using trac to coordinate the
> hobbit community.  sourcefoge looks like has a bigger supersets of features
> than trac. I like the Statistics (R1) especially. Too bad we (hobbit
> community) is not totally embraceing sourceforge.* *Ex, we still have our
> own mailling list while sourceforge provide this feature.*
>
> *I can work with either sourceforge or trac solutions, but please lets
> utilize a solution's features as much as possible.*
>
> *
> R1:
> http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php?group_id=128058&ugn=hobbitmon&type=tracker
>
> T.J. Yang
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:07:21 -0400
> From: paulehr at gmail.com
> To: hobbit at hswn.dk
> Subject: Re: [hobbit] Migration to SourceForge tracker?
>
>
> Instead of sourceforge, how about something like Trac?
>
> http://trac.edgewall.org/
>
> I think it has everything your looking for in a tracker, not to mention it
> can integrate with subversion.
>
> Another option would be if you don't want to host your own tracker is
> Launchpad
>
> https://launchpad.net/
>
> Only issue with Launchpad is that it uses bazaar instead of subverison
> for  a VCS.
>
> -Paul
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:22 AM, SebA <spa at syntec.co.uk> wrote:
>
>  Seeing as we are now using subversion (yay!), and moving to a more
> de-centralised development model, maybe it's time (or after the project
> namechange anyway) to start using the SourceForge bug and feature-request
> tracker?  (Or another tracker.)  This would enable all the developers and
> users to track the outstanding bugs instead of just Henrik.  I've noticed in
> the past that Henrik is very quick at fixing the critical bugs and core
> dumps (thanks), but other less critical ones (in trunk) seem to be
> outstanding for many months.  Having a public bug tracker would:
> (a) enable users to contribute to bugs via confirmation of the bug,
> narrowing down of the cause(s) / scenarios, testing of patches, etc.
> (b) ensure bugs (and feature requests) don't get forgotten about;
> (c) more easily allow other developers to create patches;
> (d) facilitate the release process by being able to see what might need
> fixing / doing / adding before the next release;  (I believe 4.3.0 is about
> a year overdue, but unfortunately trunk still isn't stable…)
> (e) increase the acceptance of Hobbit by users / companies, as it would
> increase the signs of life of the project (if used properly), the signs of
> support (in terms of bug fixing), etc.
> (f) encourage people posting bugs that someone who might fix their bug
> might (eventually) see their bug post! ;)
> In terms of the stability of hobbit, if new features are going to be added,
> isn't it time we branched 4.3 off from trunk?  (So we don't add new bugs to
> the 4.3 branch and further delay the release.  Or has this already been
> done?)  Personally, I would have liked this to have happened this time last
> year after Henrik announced 4.3.0 was nearly ready, instead of adding new
> features since then.  What would have happened, I suppose, is the current
> trunk would have developped into 4.4.0.  (If someone particularly wanted a
> specific new feature from trunk in 4.3, they could backport the patch.  This
> would be facilitated if patches were uploaded to the bug tracker for these
> new features when, or preferably before (thereby increasing the stability of
> trunk by allowing testing of the patch first), checking in to trunk.)  I
> expect nearly everyone knows an open-source project that works like this,
> but Asterisk is one that works well in this way, with hundreds of people
> submitting patches to their customised Mantis bug tracker.
> Kind regards,
> SebA
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Be the filmmaker you always wanted to be—learn how to burn a DVD with
> Windows(R). Make your smash hit<http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108588797/direct/01/>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> See what people are saying about Windows Live. Check out featured posts. Check
> It Out!<http://www.windowslive.com/connect?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_connect2_082008>
>



-- 
Stewart
--
You only lose what you cling to.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.xymon.com/pipermail/xymon/attachments/20080822/46d12f04/attachment.html>