[hobbit] CPU LOAD
Hubbard, Greg L
greg.hubbard at eds.com
Wed Nov 8 23:03:59 CET 2006
Perhaps. I defer to the wisdom of the group.
GLH
-----Original Message-----
From: Stef Coene [mailto:stef.coene at docum.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:57 PM
To: hobbit at hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] CPU LOAD
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 22:34, Hubbard, Greg L wrote:
> James,
>
> Not that I know of. I thought that the Unix "load" number simply
> reflects the run queue length for the system as a whole, which is
> pretty much the same no matter how many CPU's there are. Or are you
> willing to tolerate larger numbers for systems with fewer CPUs?
20 processes in the run queue is bad on a system with 1 cpu 20 processes
in the run queue is no problem for a system with 64 cpu's
Stef
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
More information about the Xymon
mailing list