<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<br><br>T.J. Yang<br><br>> From: tj_yang@hotmail.com<br>> To: hobbit@hswn.dk<br>> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:01:15 -0500<br>> Subject: RE: [hobbit] "Hobbit" name legal stuff; slight name change will happen<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> ________________________________<br>> > Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:45:21 -0400<br>> > From: gumby3203@gmail.com<br>> > To: hobbit@hswn.dk<br>> > Subject: Re: [hobbit] "Hobbit" name legal stuff; slight name change will happen<br>> > <br>> > I think it's worth asking, have those same lawyers yet stumbled upon The Shire?<br>> > <br>> > I agree with the most recent postings about PHBs and the name "Hobbit", but I wonder if the lawyers would accept HOBBIT (as opposed to Hobbit or H.O.B.B.I.T.). All caps would seem to imply it as an acronym, not needing those ugly periods.<br>> <br>> I really like the name change case of Ethereal.<br>> <br>> Ethereal -> WireShark<br>> <br>> Now we have "hobbit" need to be changed.<br>> <br>> hobbit -> hobbitmon<br>> hobbitmonitor (how about this one ? longer but no confusion)<br>> <br>> I like the hobbitmon the best now but I am concern about the "mon"(mother) part when presenting the software.<br><br>Is hobbitmon.com owned by community member here ?<br>Just right after proposing "hobbitmonitor" naming, I grabbed the "hobbitmonitor.com".<br>This name will be donated to the hobbit community if we(Henrik) decide to use HobbitMonitor over hobbitmon.<br><br><br>tj<br><br><br /><hr />Use video conversation to talk face-to-face with Windows Live Messenger. <a href='http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_messenger_video_072008' target='_new'>Get started.</a></body>
</html>