<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3268" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=969412518-07042008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>If you look through the source, the RRD support modules are
easy to spot. If you are using custom graphs, then you need to review the
ncv method, or the "roll your own" method.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=969412518-07042008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=969412518-07042008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>But, since "garbage in -> garbage out" you might be on
the right path.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=969412518-07042008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=969412518-07042008><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>GLH</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Gary Baluha [mailto:gumby3203@gmail.com]
<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, April 07, 2008 1:15 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
hobbit@hswn.dk<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [hobbit] strange graph behavior - random
machines & graphs<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>I thought I'd revisit this issue again. A new thought has
occurred to me... Where does Hobbit generate the RRD files? I
wonder what parameters Hobbit is using to pass to rrdtool, and if something
there might be acting funny with some of the data I'm providing to that Hobbit
module.<BR><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:59 AM, Gary Baluha <<A
href="mailto:gumby3203@gmail.com">gumby3203@gmail.com</A>> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">It's
interesting that it seems the CPU Load and Users and Processes graphs are
the graphs that are most likely to have this strange corruption. I
have also seen it on a few Disk graphs, but not nearly as many as the other
two graphs. Interestingly, the CPU Utilization, Network I/O, and TCP
Connection Times graphs have _never_ had this corruption. I'd also
like to say the Memory Utilization graph hasn't had this issue either,
though I can't recall with complete certainty that that is the case.
<BR><BR>I wonder what the main difference between the 3 graphs that do have
the issue is, and the 3 (possibly 4) graphs that have never exhibited this
issue. There must be some physical difference, as I can't imagine it
is all due purely to luck...
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>