<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]--><o:SmartTagType
namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="PersonName"/>
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
@page Section1
{size:595.3pt 841.9pt;
margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=blue>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Henrik have you had your meeting with the
phbs about this yet?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Jason.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font
size=2 face=Tahoma><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>
Jeffrey Chandler [mailto:jeffrey.chandler@gmail.com] <br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> 07 March 2007 13:43<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> <st1:PersonName w:st="on">hobbit@hswn.dk</st1:PersonName><br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: [hobbit] Hobbit -vs-
BB4</span></font><span lang=EN-US><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Has anyone used the
professional version of Big Brother? I switched from the Open Source
version of BB to Hobbit and haven't looked back. <br>
<br>
Jeff<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span class=gmailquote><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>On 3/6/07, <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Hubbard,
Greg L</span></b> <<a href="mailto:greg.hubbard@eds.com">greg.hubbard@eds.com</a>>
wrote:</span></font></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>When I switched from BB
to Hobbit to monitor a few tool servers, the CPU<br>
usage on the monitoring server dropped significantly for the same<br>
workload. But for my money, one of the biggest wins in Hobbit is the<br>
integration of RRD graphics throughout, and the ease of which you can <br>
add your own tests with their own trend graphs. Unless BB has played
a<br>
thorough game of catch-up, your management is planning to pay more to<br>
get less, just so they can hold some vendor "accountable".<br>
<br>
Just my own opinion, of course -- I speak for no one else.<br>
<br>
GLH<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Michael A. Price [mailto:<a href="mailto:mprice@hst.nasa.gov">mprice@hst.nasa.gov</a>]<br>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 3:53 PM <br>
To: <a href="mailto:hobbit@hswn.dk">hobbit@hswn.dk</a><br>
Subject: [hobbit] Hobbit -vs- BB4<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I currently use hobbit and devmon and love them both...<br>
<br>
But the management I work for doesnt like the idea of opensource <br>
monitoring everything, they dont understand.<br>
So they are pushing me towards BB4 instead... I have never used BB4 and<br>
dont want to...<br>
<br>
I heard they are both the same...<br>
<br>
So I figured I would ask my fellow users, why is hobbit better??? I need <br>
to make a god argument for this...<br>
<br>
thanks, michael<br>
<br>
<br>
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to<br>
<a href="mailto:hobbit-unsubscribe@hswn.dk">hobbit-unsubscribe@hswn.dk</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to<br>
<a href="mailto:hobbit-unsubscribe@hswn.dk">hobbit-unsubscribe@hswn.dk</a><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>