<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Henrik Stoerner wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid20060810212427.GF26932@hswn.dk" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 02:21:34PM -0700, Charles Jones wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Henrik Stoerner wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 02:06:39PM -0700, Charles Jones wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">And stop that madness about putting the content check into the http
column.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">LOL...Yes sir :-) The only other question I have is, how do I get 2
content checks to show? When I specify more than one, it only shows the
result of the first one (although both are shown in the info column so I
assume alerts would still work for each).
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Provided you don't force them into the same column, they should show up
a "content1" and "content2" status columns. Or whatever you name them.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Aww...but when you define multiple http checks for a single host, it
puts all of those into the same column, it would be nice to have the
content checks do the same. I guess another option is I could create a
"web" sub page and list the individual websites with dedicated cont columns.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
The problem is that the content check includes the actual webpage data.
Trying to stuff one webpage inside another can result in a pretty
awful looking status page. Doing that with two or more webpages is
just too bizarre to actually work.
Yes, I know you can probably get it right by using HTML <DIV> or
<OBJECT> tags to embed one page inside another. Unfortunately, not
all browser can handle those.
</pre>
</blockquote>
If you are doing a content check, you already know what you are looking
for, so why include the contents of the page at all? Maybe we could
only show the contents of the page if the content check fails, which
would likely just show a small footprint database or php error.<br>
<br>
Just thinking out loud. Thanks for answering my questions today.
Please also answer the one I sent yesterday about how to send you a
donation for all your hard work :)<br>
<br>
-Charles<br>
</body>
</html>