From: henrik (at) hswn.dk (Henrik Stoerner)
Reply-To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Requesting a common encrypted port number for hobbit
client/server
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:47:57 +0200
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 08:40:38AM -0500, T.J. Yang wrote:
>
> Just and idea, port 1984 over the years got recognized by some kind of
> Internet organization as default port for bb client/server communication
> port.
>
> Should we (hobbit community) pursue a common port number for hobbit
> client/server encrypted communication ?
I don't think this is necessary, and I'm not even sure such an
application will be accepted.
The current trend for protocols that operate with both plain-text
and encrypted traffic is to start with an un-encrypted connection, and
then use a "STARTTLS" command to turn on encryption. The two sides can
then negotiate if they can/will communicate.
Since this appears to be the method preferred by the Internet
authorities, that's the one I've though about implementing. That
shouldn't stop you from using stunnel, though.