[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [hobbit] Is 4.2.0 Hobbitfetch more stable than snapshot?

To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Is 4.2.0 Hobbitfetch more stable than snapshot?
From: "Charles Jones" <charles.r.jones (at) gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:20:16 -0700
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=hJyXrlwH/Gv0E4sQbUAj5k+NBg/76YE0m8qt/o/J2sje1fj1OhmdS+Mj8T/l0qt/ljX//+4+gA9ZR8afZbTwDmZC8AxrecmT+8yA7TOKLOPUf+B4cnrS+ITLLNisll8iKOR3aXF2AB5jUnEoFrmsir1x+sDOxvkaPgErj0QOJZM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=mVDezIiNC3GEFv0RzZFJgN9RDvTa1A2IVfroTmjYzXB1AeGsUXYnICQdxHK4hFoRKfDlmRlcfxAv+37l7Ody2D0jvO9JFQ6Vh2OplR9y/5TEDBgwcEm4j6waf3kD38M0CsH3slFYbIIO/8+Zs4xBO6GLho3KT2hl8aMHhS0L8n4=
References: <a5fed9820706071139u7ea06f98y4f25ee40a3d6f5b7 (at) mail.gmail.com> <20070607193333.GA18339 (at) hswn.dk> <a5fed9820706071631w61461838u8416fe6cfd5e9f8d (at) mail.gmail.com>

I'd like to report that after replacing the hobbitfetch binary with the one
from my 4.2.0 server, I have had no crashes since.

-Charles

On 6/7/07, Charles Jones <charles.r.jones (at) gmail.com> wrote:


I've replaced the malfunctioning binary with the known good one from my
other server (same OS and glibc version), I will report if it still crashes
or not.

On 6/7/07, Henrik Stoerner <henrik (at) hswn.dk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:39:02AM -0700, Charles Jones wrote:
> > So my question is, will downgrading my current install to 4.2.0 fix my
> > Hobbitfetch problems? I did a diff on the 2 hobbitfetch.c versions and
> there
> > is a slight difference - looks like the newer version has some added
> code to
> > handle IP settings in the pulldata tag, but it doesnt look like
> anything
> > that would cause crashes.
>
> I'd be interested to hear if there is a difference in behaviour between
> the two versions.
>
> It should be OK to just downgrade hobbitfetch, leaving the rest of
> Hobbit as-is.
>
>
> Regards,
> Henrik
>
>
> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>
>
>

References:
- Is 4.2.0 Hobbitfetch more stable than snapshot?
  - From: Charles Jones
- Re: [hobbit] Is 4.2.0 Hobbitfetch more stable than snapshot?
  - From: Henrik Stoerner
- Re: [hobbit] Is 4.2.0 Hobbitfetch more stable than snapshot?
  - From: Charles Jones

Prev by Date: RE: [hobbit] Newbie
Next by Date: RE: [hobbit] Newbie
Previous by thread: Re: [hobbit] Is 4.2.0 Hobbitfetch more stable than snapshot?
Next by thread: hobbit dpkg on etch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread