[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [hobbit] Which OS is better for Hobbit server ?

To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Which OS is better for Hobbit server ?
From: "Dan Simoes" <dan.simoes (at) gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:45:35 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=spqR+Z0l1Vbwzi/FHabIFlBahE4LcgR3O2OVVMwGWSyTEiVHGYnaeIDOigbxgaezb86qNZilQV6PXLRptoIlrhFPaC20kgKo4/iVYK65rFn51eevFePpL79hP4VC3gbBLl326zKhpQPN9KJ5P4JKKLr5QPTVnZP4Au9Go94Zi80=
References: <9C3678CF00954C47A0FF77FC1602977601743377@m0860p01.nordstrom.net> <BAY118-F3107283A5A6636300C417B9F140@phx.gbl>

Use what you know and like.
For me, that's Linux.  I haven't used Solaris since version 9.
I've heard that 10 is good, but for me there's no reason to look back.

On 10/11/06, T.J. Yang <tj_yang (at) hotmail.com> wrote:


Solaris 10 sparc/intel  or linux ?

Not trying to start arguments, Just want to understand how others making
their decisions ?

For me, I think Solaris 10 has following technical advantages over
linux(RH)
camp
1. Dtrace to help on problem finding.
2. Faster TCP/IP stack(rewrote and improved in Solaris 10).
3. Very rock solid stable.
4. Commercial support avaiable from Sun if needed.
5. Solarish has no  OS seat-license(RH Linux has it).

Thanks for your time

T.J. Yang

To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk

References:
- hobbitd status-board not available error
  - From: Cummings, Robert
- Which OS is better for Hobbit server ?
  - From: T.J. Yang

Prev by Date: Which OS is better for Hobbit server ?
Next by Date: Re: [hobbit] Which OS is better for Hobbit server ?
Previous by thread: Which OS is better for Hobbit server ?
Next by thread: Re: [hobbit] Which OS is better for Hobbit server ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread