[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Failover Hobbit
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Failover Hobbit
- From: Robert Edeker <idxman01 (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:52:23 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=c1CFmxBjiQDIicT3IAn/kn+SHHnwlt5OPhIif8Jl8cyEjxOQt9fXDy2Hu+3PFv7mQ53MejmMsN+pl9wSmYxF7j9jYQIlJI7cn8jZBJE4bSt2RUG+3JcmKHNVdZB1VXs1MLZitUNhenYLri4Nc6yvQ351gjb62SWBNTgw6xC/L00=
- References: <6319AEF0FF0BC4488F10029776CEAC0705A3BCB1@MAIL01.orhs.org>
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:42:42 -0500, Jeffcoat, Al <ajeffco (at) orhs.org> wrote:
> Is anyone doing any type of failover or load balancing between two hobbit
> servers? I know that there was a function to do failover in BB. I have two
> separate servers that I've installed Hobbit onto, and am having clients
> reporting to both, and they both are "clients" for each other, but I just
> want to make sure I'm doing it the right way, and see if there might be a
> better way.
I'm currently using hobbit in a failover scenario, but only one hobbit
server is up at a time. There are 3 boxes [small freebsd PC's] acting
in an active/passive/passive mode with the clients reporting to the
virtual IP. The data is rsync'ed every minute so the data loss would
be minimal.
-r